Padoo
UX Research
UX Research
UX Research
Year
'24
Tools
Figjam, Causal Modeling
Role
UX Researcher
Year
'24
Tools
Figjam, Causal Modeling
Role
UX Researcher
Year
'24
Tools
Figjam, Causal Modeling
Role
UX Researcher
A research-driven exploration of dyslexia interventions for children aged 5-10, investigating how multisensory learning and parental involvement can address phonemic awareness and fine motor skill challenges.
A research-driven exploration of dyslexia interventions for children aged 5-10, investigating how multisensory learning and parental involvement can address phonemic awareness and fine motor skill challenges.
A research-driven exploration of dyslexia interventions for children aged 5-10, investigating how multisensory learning and parental involvement can address phonemic awareness and fine motor skill challenges.
Problem Space
Understanding the Reality of Dyslexia
Developmental dyslexia affects 5-17% of school-aged children and is the most common learning disability across languages. Despite normal intelligence, these children struggle with reading fluency and accurate comprehension, presenting a significant public health concern.
The Stakes
70-80% of children with early reading difficulties continue struggling without intervention
High school dropout rates reach 35% (vs. 8% national average)
Dyslexia is typically diagnosed in 2nd-3rd grade using a "wait-to-fail" approach
Most effective interventions occur in kindergarten/1st grade—often before diagnosis
Critical brain plasticity window (ages 5-10) is frequently missed
Children experience frustration, low self-esteem, and long-term academic impacts
Research Gap
While numerous dyslexia interventions exist, limited research examines how to integrate evidence-based methodologies with parental involvement and technology-enhanced feedback for the critical 5-10 age group. Additionally, understanding the causal pathways between intervention strategies and learning outcomes remains under-explored.
Research Questions
Primary Research Questions
What are the key determinants and moderators affecting the success of phonemic awareness interventions for children with dyslexia?
How can parental involvement be structured to maximize intervention effectiveness?
What role do multisensory approaches play in improving fine motor skills and handwriting development?
What are the proximal and distal outcomes of blending and segmentation training?
Secondary Research Questions
How do factors like peer pressure, attention span, and emotional status moderate intervention effectiveness?
What preconditions (e.g., technology access) are necessary for successful intervention delivery?
How can behavioral change techniques be applied to sustain parent and child engagement?
Research Methodology
Phase 1: Systematic Literature Review
Scope:
Academic databases: PubMed, NIH, educational psychology journals
Focus areas: Dyslexia neurobiology, phonological processing, intervention efficacy
Evidence-based methodologies: Orton-Gillingham, structured literacy programs
Behavioral change theory in health interventions
Key Sources Analyzed:
CDC developmental guidelines
Dyslexia research from Harvard Medical School
International Dyslexia Association resources
Peer-reviewed intervention studies
Multisensory structured language intervention (MSLI) research
Findings:
Brain plasticity is highest in first 3 years, remains significant through age 10
Phonemic awareness is foundational for reading development
Multisensory approaches show effectiveness for dyslexic learners
Early intervention prevents 70-80% of continued reading struggles
Parent involvement correlates with improved outcomes
Phase 2: Causal Pathway Modeling
Methodology: Developed causal diagrams to map the relationship between intervention strategies, determinants, moderators, and outcomes.
Intervention 1: Phonemic Awareness Training
Causal Structure:
Mechanism: Interactive activities isolate and blend phonemes, measuring progress through correct word identification
Determinant: User engagement (attention, time, interest, effort) directly influences strategy effectiveness
Proximal Outcome: Word identification (immediate result of blending/segmentation practice)
Distal Outcome: Word fluency (long-term reading speed, accuracy, proper expression)
Moderators: Peer pressure, attention span, emotional status shape intervention effectiveness
Precondition: iPad access for digital tool engagement
Key Insights:
Engagement serves as the critical bottleneck between intervention and outcomes
Moderators significantly impact how children interact with interventions
Proximal outcomes (word identification) must be achieved before distal outcomes (fluency)
Technology access creates equity considerations
Intervention 2: Fine Motor Skills Development
Causal Structure:
Mechanism: Digital tracing tools with immediate corrective feedback
Determinant: Practice consistency and parental supervision
Proximal Outcome: Improved hand-eye coordination and letter formation
Distal Outcome: Handwriting fluency and motor skill development
Moderators: Fine motor baseline ability, frustration tolerance, device familiarity
Precondition: Access to tablet/stylus technology
Key Insights:
Technology-enhanced feedback provides immediate reinforcement
Motor skill development requires sustained practice over time
Parental supervision moderates practice consistency
Baseline abilities affect intervention starting point and progression rate
Phase 3: Behavioral Change Theory Analysis
Framework: Behavioral Change Techniques (BCTs) for health interventions
Research Focus: How can BCTs increase intervention adherence and effectiveness?
BCTs Identified for Application:
1. Prompt Intention Formation
Definition: Encouraging explicit commitments to behavior
Application: Parents set clear learning goals during onboarding
Research Support: Intention formation strengthens behavioral follow-through
Expected Outcome: Increased parental commitment and consistent app usage
2. Prompt Specific Goal Setting
Definition: Defining detailed, measurable objectives
Application: Parents specify frequency, intensity, duration of practice sessions
Research Support: Specific goals create accountability and direction
Expected Outcome: Structured learning routines aligned with child needs
3. Monitoring
Definition: Tracking performance and progress over time
Application: Dashboard displays attempts, correct responses, time spent
Research Support: Monitoring enables data-driven adjustments
Expected Outcome: Parents identify patterns and adjust strategies
4. Providing Feedback on Performance
Definition: Immediate input on task execution
Application: Real-time feedback during exercises
Research Support: Feedback reinforces correct behavior and guides corrections
Expected Outcome: Faster skill acquisition and confidence building
Phase 4: Comparative Analysis - Design Alternatives
Research Question: What engagement strategies best support learning without undermining confidence?
Alternative | Hypothesis | Literature Findings | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
Alternative 1: Gamification (Points/Badges) | Competition and rewards increase engagement |
| Not recommended for target age group (5-10) with existing confidence challenges |
Alternative 2: Automated Adaptive Systems | AI-driven assessment provides optimal personalization |
| Manual goal-setting preserves parental agency and involvement |
Alternative 3: Real-Time Notifications | Immediate alerts increase parental engagement |
| Dashboard approach provides flexibility and comprehensive tracking |
Key Research Findings
Finding 1: The Critical Window Is Underutilized
Evidence:
Brain plasticity research shows highest adaptability in first 3 years, significant through age 10
Current diagnosis typically occurs in 2nd-3rd grade (ages 7-8)
Most effective interventions documented in K-1st grade (ages 5-6)
Implication: Interventions targeting ages 5-10 can capitalize on neuroplasticity before traditional diagnosis, potentially preventing long-term reading difficulties.
Research Gap Addressed: How to deliver evidence-based interventions before formal diagnosis during optimal brain development window.
Finding 2: Engagement Is the Critical Mediator
Evidence from Causal Modeling:
User engagement (attention, time, interest, effort) directly determines intervention effectiveness
Even evidence-based interventions fail without sustained engagement
Multiple moderators (peer pressure, attention span, emotional status) affect engagement
Implication: Intervention design must prioritize engagement strategies that account for moderating factors rather than focusing solely on pedagogical content.
Research Gap Addressed: Understanding the causal pathway from intervention delivery to learning outcomes reveals engagement as the critical bottleneck.
Finding 3: Parental Involvement Requires Structured Support
Evidence:
BCT literature shows intention formation and goal-setting increase behavioral follow-through
Monitoring enables adaptive support strategies
Parents need agency in goal-setting to maintain involvement
Implication: Passive parental observation is insufficient; structured involvement through goal-setting and monitoring increases intervention effectiveness.
Research Gap Addressed: How to operationalize parental involvement beyond general encouragement into specific, actionable behaviors.
Finding 4: Multisensory Approaches Address Multiple Deficits
Evidence:
Dyslexia involves reduced neuroplasticity in left hemisphere (Broca's area, parietal lobe, temporal lobe)
Multisensory interventions (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) strengthen multiple brain networks
Orton-Gillingham and structured literacy show efficacy across studies
Implication: Single-modality interventions may be insufficient; comprehensive approaches engaging multiple senses address the neurobiological complexity of dyslexia.
Research Gap Addressed: Why multisensory approaches work: they compensate for widespread neuroplasticity reduction by engaging multiple brain regions.
Finding 5: Technology Enables Immediate Feedback
Evidence:
Fine motor skill development requires immediate corrective feedback
Traditional methods (paper/pencil) lack real-time response
Technology-enhanced feedback shows improved motor learning outcomes
Implication: Digital interventions offer unique advantages over traditional methods through immediate, consistent feedback mechanisms.
Research Gap Addressed: How technology can enhance rather than simply replicate traditional intervention methods.
Research Contributions
Theoretical Contributions
1. Causal Pathway Modeling
Explicitly maps intervention mechanisms, determinants, moderators, and outcomes
Identifies engagement as critical mediating factor
Provides framework for understanding intervention failure points
2. BCT Application Framework
Demonstrates how behavioral change techniques apply to educational interventions
Shows specific operationalization of abstract BCTs
Creates replicable model for parent involvement design
3. Integrated Multisensory Model
Synthesizes neurobiological research with intervention design
Explains why multisensory approaches work at neural level
Connects brain plasticity research to practical application
Practical Contributions
1. Design Framework
Evidence-based design recommendations for dyslexia interventions
Comparative analysis of alternative approaches
Clear rationale for each design decision
2. Research-Informed Prototype
Translates research findings into concrete features
Demonstrates feasibility of integrated approach
Provides foundation for future testing and refinement
3. Gap Identification
Highlights underutilized critical intervention window
Reveals need for structured parental involvement tools
Identifies technology advantages over traditional methods
Problem Space
Understanding the Reality of Dyslexia
Developmental dyslexia affects 5-17% of school-aged children and is the most common learning disability across languages. Despite normal intelligence, these children struggle with reading fluency and accurate comprehension, presenting a significant public health concern.
The Stakes
70-80% of children with early reading difficulties continue struggling without intervention
High school dropout rates reach 35% (vs. 8% national average)
Dyslexia is typically diagnosed in 2nd-3rd grade using a "wait-to-fail" approach
Most effective interventions occur in kindergarten/1st grade—often before diagnosis
Critical brain plasticity window (ages 5-10) is frequently missed
Children experience frustration, low self-esteem, and long-term academic impacts
Research Gap
While numerous dyslexia interventions exist, limited research examines how to integrate evidence-based methodologies with parental involvement and technology-enhanced feedback for the critical 5-10 age group. Additionally, understanding the causal pathways between intervention strategies and learning outcomes remains under-explored.
Research Questions
Primary Research Questions
What are the key determinants and moderators affecting the success of phonemic awareness interventions for children with dyslexia?
How can parental involvement be structured to maximize intervention effectiveness?
What role do multisensory approaches play in improving fine motor skills and handwriting development?
What are the proximal and distal outcomes of blending and segmentation training?
Secondary Research Questions
How do factors like peer pressure, attention span, and emotional status moderate intervention effectiveness?
What preconditions (e.g., technology access) are necessary for successful intervention delivery?
How can behavioral change techniques be applied to sustain parent and child engagement?
Research Methodology
Phase 1: Systematic Literature Review
Scope:
Academic databases: PubMed, NIH, educational psychology journals
Focus areas: Dyslexia neurobiology, phonological processing, intervention efficacy
Evidence-based methodologies: Orton-Gillingham, structured literacy programs
Behavioral change theory in health interventions
Key Sources Analyzed:
CDC developmental guidelines
Dyslexia research from Harvard Medical School
International Dyslexia Association resources
Peer-reviewed intervention studies
Multisensory structured language intervention (MSLI) research
Findings:
Brain plasticity is highest in first 3 years, remains significant through age 10
Phonemic awareness is foundational for reading development
Multisensory approaches show effectiveness for dyslexic learners
Early intervention prevents 70-80% of continued reading struggles
Parent involvement correlates with improved outcomes
Phase 2: Causal Pathway Modeling
Methodology: Developed causal diagrams to map the relationship between intervention strategies, determinants, moderators, and outcomes.
Intervention 1: Phonemic Awareness Training
Causal Structure:
Mechanism: Interactive activities isolate and blend phonemes, measuring progress through correct word identification
Determinant: User engagement (attention, time, interest, effort) directly influences strategy effectiveness
Proximal Outcome: Word identification (immediate result of blending/segmentation practice)
Distal Outcome: Word fluency (long-term reading speed, accuracy, proper expression)
Moderators: Peer pressure, attention span, emotional status shape intervention effectiveness
Precondition: iPad access for digital tool engagement
Key Insights:
Engagement serves as the critical bottleneck between intervention and outcomes
Moderators significantly impact how children interact with interventions
Proximal outcomes (word identification) must be achieved before distal outcomes (fluency)
Technology access creates equity considerations
Intervention 2: Fine Motor Skills Development
Causal Structure:
Mechanism: Digital tracing tools with immediate corrective feedback
Determinant: Practice consistency and parental supervision
Proximal Outcome: Improved hand-eye coordination and letter formation
Distal Outcome: Handwriting fluency and motor skill development
Moderators: Fine motor baseline ability, frustration tolerance, device familiarity
Precondition: Access to tablet/stylus technology
Key Insights:
Technology-enhanced feedback provides immediate reinforcement
Motor skill development requires sustained practice over time
Parental supervision moderates practice consistency
Baseline abilities affect intervention starting point and progression rate
Phase 3: Behavioral Change Theory Analysis
Framework: Behavioral Change Techniques (BCTs) for health interventions
Research Focus: How can BCTs increase intervention adherence and effectiveness?
BCTs Identified for Application:
1. Prompt Intention Formation
Definition: Encouraging explicit commitments to behavior
Application: Parents set clear learning goals during onboarding
Research Support: Intention formation strengthens behavioral follow-through
Expected Outcome: Increased parental commitment and consistent app usage
2. Prompt Specific Goal Setting
Definition: Defining detailed, measurable objectives
Application: Parents specify frequency, intensity, duration of practice sessions
Research Support: Specific goals create accountability and direction
Expected Outcome: Structured learning routines aligned with child needs
3. Monitoring
Definition: Tracking performance and progress over time
Application: Dashboard displays attempts, correct responses, time spent
Research Support: Monitoring enables data-driven adjustments
Expected Outcome: Parents identify patterns and adjust strategies
4. Providing Feedback on Performance
Definition: Immediate input on task execution
Application: Real-time feedback during exercises
Research Support: Feedback reinforces correct behavior and guides corrections
Expected Outcome: Faster skill acquisition and confidence building
Phase 4: Comparative Analysis - Design Alternatives
Research Question: What engagement strategies best support learning without undermining confidence?
Alternative | Hypothesis | Literature Findings | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
Alternative 1: Gamification (Points/Badges) | Competition and rewards increase engagement |
| Not recommended for target age group (5-10) with existing confidence challenges |
Alternative 2: Automated Adaptive Systems | AI-driven assessment provides optimal personalization |
| Manual goal-setting preserves parental agency and involvement |
Alternative 3: Real-Time Notifications | Immediate alerts increase parental engagement |
| Dashboard approach provides flexibility and comprehensive tracking |
Key Research Findings
Finding 1: The Critical Window Is Underutilized
Evidence:
Brain plasticity research shows highest adaptability in first 3 years, significant through age 10
Current diagnosis typically occurs in 2nd-3rd grade (ages 7-8)
Most effective interventions documented in K-1st grade (ages 5-6)
Implication: Interventions targeting ages 5-10 can capitalize on neuroplasticity before traditional diagnosis, potentially preventing long-term reading difficulties.
Research Gap Addressed: How to deliver evidence-based interventions before formal diagnosis during optimal brain development window.
Finding 2: Engagement Is the Critical Mediator
Evidence from Causal Modeling:
User engagement (attention, time, interest, effort) directly determines intervention effectiveness
Even evidence-based interventions fail without sustained engagement
Multiple moderators (peer pressure, attention span, emotional status) affect engagement
Implication: Intervention design must prioritize engagement strategies that account for moderating factors rather than focusing solely on pedagogical content.
Research Gap Addressed: Understanding the causal pathway from intervention delivery to learning outcomes reveals engagement as the critical bottleneck.
Finding 3: Parental Involvement Requires Structured Support
Evidence:
BCT literature shows intention formation and goal-setting increase behavioral follow-through
Monitoring enables adaptive support strategies
Parents need agency in goal-setting to maintain involvement
Implication: Passive parental observation is insufficient; structured involvement through goal-setting and monitoring increases intervention effectiveness.
Research Gap Addressed: How to operationalize parental involvement beyond general encouragement into specific, actionable behaviors.
Finding 4: Multisensory Approaches Address Multiple Deficits
Evidence:
Dyslexia involves reduced neuroplasticity in left hemisphere (Broca's area, parietal lobe, temporal lobe)
Multisensory interventions (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) strengthen multiple brain networks
Orton-Gillingham and structured literacy show efficacy across studies
Implication: Single-modality interventions may be insufficient; comprehensive approaches engaging multiple senses address the neurobiological complexity of dyslexia.
Research Gap Addressed: Why multisensory approaches work: they compensate for widespread neuroplasticity reduction by engaging multiple brain regions.
Finding 5: Technology Enables Immediate Feedback
Evidence:
Fine motor skill development requires immediate corrective feedback
Traditional methods (paper/pencil) lack real-time response
Technology-enhanced feedback shows improved motor learning outcomes
Implication: Digital interventions offer unique advantages over traditional methods through immediate, consistent feedback mechanisms.
Research Gap Addressed: How technology can enhance rather than simply replicate traditional intervention methods.
Research Contributions
Theoretical Contributions
1. Causal Pathway Modeling
Explicitly maps intervention mechanisms, determinants, moderators, and outcomes
Identifies engagement as critical mediating factor
Provides framework for understanding intervention failure points
2. BCT Application Framework
Demonstrates how behavioral change techniques apply to educational interventions
Shows specific operationalization of abstract BCTs
Creates replicable model for parent involvement design
3. Integrated Multisensory Model
Synthesizes neurobiological research with intervention design
Explains why multisensory approaches work at neural level
Connects brain plasticity research to practical application
Practical Contributions
1. Design Framework
Evidence-based design recommendations for dyslexia interventions
Comparative analysis of alternative approaches
Clear rationale for each design decision
2. Research-Informed Prototype
Translates research findings into concrete features
Demonstrates feasibility of integrated approach
Provides foundation for future testing and refinement
3. Gap Identification
Highlights underutilized critical intervention window
Reveals need for structured parental involvement tools
Identifies technology advantages over traditional methods
Problem Space
Understanding the Reality of Dyslexia
Developmental dyslexia affects 5-17% of school-aged children and is the most common learning disability across languages. Despite normal intelligence, these children struggle with reading fluency and accurate comprehension, presenting a significant public health concern.
The Stakes
70-80% of children with early reading difficulties continue struggling without intervention
High school dropout rates reach 35% (vs. 8% national average)
Dyslexia is typically diagnosed in 2nd-3rd grade using a "wait-to-fail" approach
Most effective interventions occur in kindergarten/1st grade—often before diagnosis
Critical brain plasticity window (ages 5-10) is frequently missed
Children experience frustration, low self-esteem, and long-term academic impacts
Research Gap
While numerous dyslexia interventions exist, limited research examines how to integrate evidence-based methodologies with parental involvement and technology-enhanced feedback for the critical 5-10 age group. Additionally, understanding the causal pathways between intervention strategies and learning outcomes remains under-explored.
Research Questions
Primary Research Questions
What are the key determinants and moderators affecting the success of phonemic awareness interventions for children with dyslexia?
How can parental involvement be structured to maximize intervention effectiveness?
What role do multisensory approaches play in improving fine motor skills and handwriting development?
What are the proximal and distal outcomes of blending and segmentation training?
Secondary Research Questions
How do factors like peer pressure, attention span, and emotional status moderate intervention effectiveness?
What preconditions (e.g., technology access) are necessary for successful intervention delivery?
How can behavioral change techniques be applied to sustain parent and child engagement?
Research Methodology
Phase 1: Systematic Literature Review
Scope:
Academic databases: PubMed, NIH, educational psychology journals
Focus areas: Dyslexia neurobiology, phonological processing, intervention efficacy
Evidence-based methodologies: Orton-Gillingham, structured literacy programs
Behavioral change theory in health interventions
Key Sources Analyzed:
CDC developmental guidelines
Dyslexia research from Harvard Medical School
International Dyslexia Association resources
Peer-reviewed intervention studies
Multisensory structured language intervention (MSLI) research
Findings:
Brain plasticity is highest in first 3 years, remains significant through age 10
Phonemic awareness is foundational for reading development
Multisensory approaches show effectiveness for dyslexic learners
Early intervention prevents 70-80% of continued reading struggles
Parent involvement correlates with improved outcomes
Phase 2: Causal Pathway Modeling
Methodology: Developed causal diagrams to map the relationship between intervention strategies, determinants, moderators, and outcomes.
Intervention 1: Phonemic Awareness Training
Causal Structure:
Mechanism: Interactive activities isolate and blend phonemes, measuring progress through correct word identification
Determinant: User engagement (attention, time, interest, effort) directly influences strategy effectiveness
Proximal Outcome: Word identification (immediate result of blending/segmentation practice)
Distal Outcome: Word fluency (long-term reading speed, accuracy, proper expression)
Moderators: Peer pressure, attention span, emotional status shape intervention effectiveness
Precondition: iPad access for digital tool engagement
Key Insights:
Engagement serves as the critical bottleneck between intervention and outcomes
Moderators significantly impact how children interact with interventions
Proximal outcomes (word identification) must be achieved before distal outcomes (fluency)
Technology access creates equity considerations
Intervention 2: Fine Motor Skills Development
Causal Structure:
Mechanism: Digital tracing tools with immediate corrective feedback
Determinant: Practice consistency and parental supervision
Proximal Outcome: Improved hand-eye coordination and letter formation
Distal Outcome: Handwriting fluency and motor skill development
Moderators: Fine motor baseline ability, frustration tolerance, device familiarity
Precondition: Access to tablet/stylus technology
Key Insights:
Technology-enhanced feedback provides immediate reinforcement
Motor skill development requires sustained practice over time
Parental supervision moderates practice consistency
Baseline abilities affect intervention starting point and progression rate
Phase 3: Behavioral Change Theory Analysis
Framework: Behavioral Change Techniques (BCTs) for health interventions
Research Focus: How can BCTs increase intervention adherence and effectiveness?
BCTs Identified for Application:
1. Prompt Intention Formation
Definition: Encouraging explicit commitments to behavior
Application: Parents set clear learning goals during onboarding
Research Support: Intention formation strengthens behavioral follow-through
Expected Outcome: Increased parental commitment and consistent app usage
2. Prompt Specific Goal Setting
Definition: Defining detailed, measurable objectives
Application: Parents specify frequency, intensity, duration of practice sessions
Research Support: Specific goals create accountability and direction
Expected Outcome: Structured learning routines aligned with child needs
3. Monitoring
Definition: Tracking performance and progress over time
Application: Dashboard displays attempts, correct responses, time spent
Research Support: Monitoring enables data-driven adjustments
Expected Outcome: Parents identify patterns and adjust strategies
4. Providing Feedback on Performance
Definition: Immediate input on task execution
Application: Real-time feedback during exercises
Research Support: Feedback reinforces correct behavior and guides corrections
Expected Outcome: Faster skill acquisition and confidence building
Phase 4: Comparative Analysis - Design Alternatives
Research Question: What engagement strategies best support learning without undermining confidence?
Alternative | Hypothesis | Literature Findings | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
Alternative 1: Gamification (Points/Badges) | Competition and rewards increase engagement |
| Not recommended for target age group (5-10) with existing confidence challenges |
Alternative 2: Automated Adaptive Systems | AI-driven assessment provides optimal personalization |
| Manual goal-setting preserves parental agency and involvement |
Alternative 3: Real-Time Notifications | Immediate alerts increase parental engagement |
| Dashboard approach provides flexibility and comprehensive tracking |
Key Research Findings
Finding 1: The Critical Window Is Underutilized
Evidence:
Brain plasticity research shows highest adaptability in first 3 years, significant through age 10
Current diagnosis typically occurs in 2nd-3rd grade (ages 7-8)
Most effective interventions documented in K-1st grade (ages 5-6)
Implication: Interventions targeting ages 5-10 can capitalize on neuroplasticity before traditional diagnosis, potentially preventing long-term reading difficulties.
Research Gap Addressed: How to deliver evidence-based interventions before formal diagnosis during optimal brain development window.
Finding 2: Engagement Is the Critical Mediator
Evidence from Causal Modeling:
User engagement (attention, time, interest, effort) directly determines intervention effectiveness
Even evidence-based interventions fail without sustained engagement
Multiple moderators (peer pressure, attention span, emotional status) affect engagement
Implication: Intervention design must prioritize engagement strategies that account for moderating factors rather than focusing solely on pedagogical content.
Research Gap Addressed: Understanding the causal pathway from intervention delivery to learning outcomes reveals engagement as the critical bottleneck.
Finding 3: Parental Involvement Requires Structured Support
Evidence:
BCT literature shows intention formation and goal-setting increase behavioral follow-through
Monitoring enables adaptive support strategies
Parents need agency in goal-setting to maintain involvement
Implication: Passive parental observation is insufficient; structured involvement through goal-setting and monitoring increases intervention effectiveness.
Research Gap Addressed: How to operationalize parental involvement beyond general encouragement into specific, actionable behaviors.
Finding 4: Multisensory Approaches Address Multiple Deficits
Evidence:
Dyslexia involves reduced neuroplasticity in left hemisphere (Broca's area, parietal lobe, temporal lobe)
Multisensory interventions (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) strengthen multiple brain networks
Orton-Gillingham and structured literacy show efficacy across studies
Implication: Single-modality interventions may be insufficient; comprehensive approaches engaging multiple senses address the neurobiological complexity of dyslexia.
Research Gap Addressed: Why multisensory approaches work: they compensate for widespread neuroplasticity reduction by engaging multiple brain regions.
Finding 5: Technology Enables Immediate Feedback
Evidence:
Fine motor skill development requires immediate corrective feedback
Traditional methods (paper/pencil) lack real-time response
Technology-enhanced feedback shows improved motor learning outcomes
Implication: Digital interventions offer unique advantages over traditional methods through immediate, consistent feedback mechanisms.
Research Gap Addressed: How technology can enhance rather than simply replicate traditional intervention methods.
Research Contributions
Theoretical Contributions
1. Causal Pathway Modeling
Explicitly maps intervention mechanisms, determinants, moderators, and outcomes
Identifies engagement as critical mediating factor
Provides framework for understanding intervention failure points
2. BCT Application Framework
Demonstrates how behavioral change techniques apply to educational interventions
Shows specific operationalization of abstract BCTs
Creates replicable model for parent involvement design
3. Integrated Multisensory Model
Synthesizes neurobiological research with intervention design
Explains why multisensory approaches work at neural level
Connects brain plasticity research to practical application
Practical Contributions
1. Design Framework
Evidence-based design recommendations for dyslexia interventions
Comparative analysis of alternative approaches
Clear rationale for each design decision
2. Research-Informed Prototype
Translates research findings into concrete features
Demonstrates feasibility of integrated approach
Provides foundation for future testing and refinement
3. Gap Identification
Highlights underutilized critical intervention window
Reveals need for structured parental involvement tools
Identifies technology advantages over traditional methods
Challenge
Developmental dyslexia affects 5-17% of school-aged children, yet the "wait-to-fail" diagnostic approach delays intervention until 2nd-3rd grade—missing the critical window when brains are most adaptable. Despite extensive research on effective interventions, no integrated framework combines evidence-based content with structured parental involvement for this critical age window.
Solution
Through systematic literature review, causal modeling, and behavioral change theory analysis, we developed a research-informed framework integrating multisensory interventions with four behavioral change techniques.
Challenge
Developmental dyslexia affects 5-17% of school-aged children, yet the "wait-to-fail" diagnostic approach delays intervention until 2nd-3rd grade—missing the critical window when brains are most adaptable. Despite extensive research on effective interventions, no integrated framework combines evidence-based content with structured parental involvement for this critical age window.
Solution
Through systematic literature review, causal modeling, and behavioral change theory analysis, we developed a research-informed framework integrating multisensory interventions with four behavioral change techniques.
Challenge
Developmental dyslexia affects 5-17% of school-aged children, yet the "wait-to-fail" diagnostic approach delays intervention until 2nd-3rd grade—missing the critical window when brains are most adaptable. Despite extensive research on effective interventions, no integrated framework combines evidence-based content with structured parental involvement for this critical age window.
Solution
Through systematic literature review, causal modeling, and behavioral change theory analysis, we developed a research-informed framework integrating multisensory interventions with four behavioral change techniques.
EducAide
Quicken Simplifi
EducAide
Quicken Simplifi
EducAide
Quicken Simplifi